An exciting thing about being involved with Project
Baseline: Lake Tahoe is that as time has moved forward from that “stake in the
ground” beginning (2011), we have broadened our involvement into some pretty
cool aspects of environmental data collection in Tahoe; which has led to some very incredible dives.
The Team formulating a strategy & logistics for our dive. |
The original plan for these dives was to utilize the New
Millennium dive boat but at 5pm on Friday the 30th, NOAA put out a
Lake Wind Advisory – which typically recommends small crafts like ours stay off
the lake. So we heeded the advice, left
the boat in the garage and explored another plan which would see us working
directly off the beach. We thought we
had close beach access to the study site – not to be – so we had to again
readjust our plan once arriving at the lake.
Turns out we needed to move equipment and supplies about 10 minutes down
the beach south or about 1250 feet. Hauling our gear fully equipped and in our
drysuits would have been incredibly difficult and fraught with the risk of
turning an ankle on the lake rock dominated beach so, we decided that we would
enter the water at the beach parking and utilize tour Dive Propulsion Vehicles
(DPV’S) to transport us and our in water supplies the 1250 feet down the beach
while Byron, David and Sudeep would carry other supplies to the study area as
they were not diving.
The goals for
today were to 1) conduct 2 dives of about 45 minutes per dive total including decompression,
2) establish transects (fixed line) from 3’ to 200’ at the Ward Creek Site and
on Stateline Point, 3) place 4 bricks at each sampling depth during ascent
200ft, 135ft, 100ft, 65ft & 33ft, 4) place 4 bricks at the 9ft and 3ft
sampling depths but utilizing a hold down system for the bricks due to
potential rough water as we head into winter and 5) collect two similar sized
rock samples from 33ft and 9ft then place
them in separate and marked zip-lock bags.
Spoiler Alert!!! We were only
able to successfully complete the dive at the Ward Creek study area and 45
minutes underwater turned into 125!
Martin placing the 1m (3ft) stake and Todd organizing line. |
With the on
land task of building the mesh cages complete, the next step was to figure out
how to properly secure the bricks at the 3 foot and 9 foot stations. This was of concern because in a big winter
storm with heavy winds, these depths could receive quite vigorous water
movement and we did not want to return in 3 months to find the bricks gone as
they are a critical part of this study.
Once we discussed several ideas, we decided to let Byron, Dave and
Sudeep create these while Martin and Todd were underwater.
Mesh cage - 12in x 8in to keep Crayfish out. |
With the
sampling station infrastructure designed, we then had to organize everything
that was to go underwater into two cashes that would be manageable underwater
by two divers. A digression here, we were
supposed to have a team of 3 but one of our very loyal and committed divers ran
into a huge drysuit problem and simply did not have the equipment to fix his
suit in time for the dive. In hindsight, maybe we could have eliminated the photo tasks. Unfortunately this is one of the most important underwater aspects of work like this. A picture is truly worth a 1000 words and even more critical when documenting the
underwater world. We would simply have to rise to the challenge; we did
and laughed a bunch.
The next
addition to our basic objective is that David with the USGS wanted us to place
digital temperature sensors with specific markings at specific depths. Not a huge task in and of itself but the importance of placing the correctly marked sensor at the proper depth meant that we had to do some organization underwater. We felt that one more task while there was worth the data it would provide. So added to the task and equipment list, we continued.
Here was the
inventory that we had to transport from the surface to depth: 20 bricks - 5
wire mesh boxes - 5 stakes to hold down the mesh boxes - a 5lb hammer to drive
those stakes in - an auger to hold the end of the transect line ending at 200
feet - a spool of line with 1500’ of 1/8” line - 5 digital temperature monitors
– 20, 9 inch plastic zip ties - 4 zip-lock bags - all our normal gear and the camera system (a
200’ rated camera that at 200’…did not work but thankfully worked
shallower).
3m (9ft) station.2 bricks uncovered, 2 covered & Temp Sensor (up rt cnr) |
With all supplies and a solid mission plan in place, the
dive began about 1pm; the 3’ starting point is at the coordinates, 39.135724°, -120.151568°.
You are
probably beginning to understand now why what was originally planned to be a 45
minute dive, turned out to be 125 - we just had a lot of supplies and
coordination to deal with; doing these types of dives has no "instruction manual". You simply have to formulate a plan and execute then assess for improvement.
The time factor though was effected by another issue. Typically this side of the lake is quite steep and depth increases very rapidly but, yes, you guessed it, that was not to be for us. The underwater slope here was much more gradual and we estimate that we laid down approximately 1000-1200 feet of line as it took us almost 25 minutes to reach 200 feet; our original plan was for about 10-15 minutes with a distance planned of about 750 feet per the chart based upon the coordinates we were originally provided. Unfortunately the chart was not as accurate as you would expect; we called this the Ward Creek study area but in fact we were about one-half a mile north of the Ward Creek outflow.
The time factor though was effected by another issue. Typically this side of the lake is quite steep and depth increases very rapidly but, yes, you guessed it, that was not to be for us. The underwater slope here was much more gradual and we estimate that we laid down approximately 1000-1200 feet of line as it took us almost 25 minutes to reach 200 feet; our original plan was for about 10-15 minutes with a distance planned of about 750 feet per the chart based upon the coordinates we were originally provided. Unfortunately the chart was not as accurate as you would expect; we called this the Ward Creek study area but in fact we were about one-half a mile north of the Ward Creek outflow.
The only image from 200ft |
One of the 7 Periphyton (Algae) growth stations - 100ft.2 bricks uncovered, 2 covered, Temp sensor #5 |
Photo Credit: NatGeo - Dr. Stan Loeb diver |
The other “diving" aspect of this that is real interesting is that in 1978-1979 the divers doing this initial study completed dives to 200’ with equipment of the day that was no where near as quality as the gear is today. They did not have rebreathers, mixed gas, computers and drysuits with heaters. They had, well... crap! One of the divers from back then was the main student/scientist doing his dissertation, Stan Loeb: now Dr. Stan Loeb and is working out of the University of Kansas. We had the chance to talk with him over the past several months and he told quite a few great stories. I hope he gets to Reno someday so I can buy him a drink and treat him to lunch so he will divulge just how he pulled off these dives in wetsuits, no altitude depth gauges, AIR, single tanks, rubber masks that always leaked (silicone had not been used at the time in mask construction) and other limitations of the day. We are very fortunate to be diving in a time where technology has kept pace keeping us safe and warm.
We exited
the water at 4pm and were on our way home by 5.